Archive for Co-op
Manhattan Residential Rental Market Report Fourth Quarter 2011
Posted by: | CommentsThis week, we released our Fourth Quarter report for the Manhattan Residenital Rental Market. Manhattan Residential Rentals Market Overview Q4 2011 reported here and summarized below was prepared by Miller Samuel for Prudential Douglas Elliman.
“Tight mortgage credit conditions continued to drive rental prices and activity higher.”
- The median net effective rent (face rent less landlord concessions) jumped 9.5% from $2,950 to $3,121 in the same period last year. The year-over-year-gains were consistent across all rental price indicators.
- The 2-bedroom and 3-bedroom markets outpaced their smaller counterparts,increasing 14% and 18.1% respectively over the same period.
- New rental activity (excluding lease renewals) was up 10% from 7,217 to 7,942 in the same quarter last year.
- About 7.4% of new leases had some form of landlord concession compared to the 40.5% in the prior year quarter. For those leases with concessions, the average amount was the equivalent of 1.2 months of free rent.
- Days on market—the number of days from original list date to lease signing—was at its second fastest pace of 37 days in 15 years, which is when we began tracking this metric.
Last Week’s Headline Review
Posted by: | Comments* 50 Hotels to open in NYC through 2013: “Building a hotel in New York City is becoming more affordable than buying one, as demand from publicly traded investors helps drive a surge in property prices. Read more
* Are low prices behind increase in co-op board rejections?: “Co-op boards are rejecting buyers with increasing frequency, and according to New York Magazine that may have something to do with the bargain prices on apartments during the downturn.” Read more
* Wealthy Buyers still active in global cities: “The world’s wealthiest individuals are continuing to purchase luxury residential property in key international cities…” From The Real Deal Read more:
Manhattan Co-op/Condo Residential Sales Market Report Third Quarter 2011
Posted by: | CommentsOur Q3 Manhattan Market Overview which was released Tuesday and summarized below was prepared by Miller Samuel for Prudential Douglas Elliman.
- Housing prices in Manhattan continue to remain stable. The median sales price of a Manhattan apartment was $911,333 in the third quarter, essentially unchanged from $914,000 in the prior year quarter and up 7.2% from $850,000 in the prior quarter.
- Although year-over-year co-op sales activity was unchanged, the increase in condo activity resulted in a 16.7% year-over-year increase in overall sales activity. An increase in demand from foreign buyers due to the weak US dollar is likely a key factor for the gain.
- There were 7,726 active listings at the end of the third quarter, 4.9% fewer than 8,123 listings in the same period last year and 4.3% less than 8,070 listings in the prior quarter.
- Consistent with the decline in inventory, the time to sell an apartment and the discount from list price have also declined. Days on market fell to 119 days from 125 days and the discount from the list price at time of sale slipped to 4.4% from 5.8%, both from the same period last year.
Week in Review: News You Can Use July 8, 2011
Posted by: | Comments- “Despite a banner month for Governor Cuomo, New Yorkers put their Trumpets down when it came to the Economy” Read all about it at Siena Research Institute
- New York City Tax Commissioner Announces 10% Assessment Cap on Co-ops, Condos. “New York City Finance Commissioner David M. Frankel confronted his critics yesterday at a City Council Hearing in May, announcing he was placing a 10% cap on tax assessment increases for co-op and condo properties in the five Boroughs.” Read about it at Habitat.
- AGs, Banks near $60B deal on Foreclosures. “America’s biggest mortgage servicers are closing in on a deal with federal and state officials to settle some of the thorniest foreclosure problems.” Read about it in the New York Post.
- Manhattan rents rise with room to go higher. “The Manhattan apartment rental market has been heating up for months, and second-quarter market reports released today by residential brokerages Citi Habitats and Prudential Douglas Elliman show skyrocketing rents. Now, the question is how long the rent increases will continue.” Read about it at the Real Deal
- Homes Dark and Lifeless, Kept by Out-of-Towners “some Manhattan neighborhoods are assuming that vacant feeling the year round, because the people who own or rent apartments there actually live somewhere else most of the time” Read about it in the New York Times
Week in Review: News You Can Use June 10, 2011
Posted by: | Comments- Foreclosures fall 38% in May for New York City according to data from PropertyShark.com, the total number of residential foreclosures fell last month from May 2010, however co-op apartments made up 79% of all new foreclosure auctions scheduled. Read it all in Crain’s New York
- Federal Reserve publishes Beige Book June 8, 2011 “The Second District’s economy has continued to expand since the last report, though at a somewhat diminished pace.”
- City’s Design Sector grew 75% the past decade: “More designers are employed here than in any other U.S. city, thanks in part to an explosion in recent years of Brooklyn-based companies, said the report, released on Wednesday by The Center for an Urban Future, a think tank in Manhattan. It noted that the number of Brooklyn-based firms spiked from 257 in 2001 to 433 in 2009, for a 70% increase”. Read it all in Crain’s New York.
- The Bullish Case for the U.S. Economy “Investment strategist Robert Doll says America’s edge is faster population growth, companies that are global in scope, and a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship.” Read it all in the Wall Street Journal.
360 East 72nd Street: Working Together For The Benefit All Residents
Posted by: | Comments
Recently I wrote a 3 part series on Coop financial statements. In Part 1, we discussed the General Principles of a Coop Corporation and the Telltale signs of a GOOD Building. Part 2 discussed what to look for in Coop Financials. In Part 3 we look at assessing a Coop’s financial condition.
As I pointed out, Coops seldom conduct a study to determine the remaining useful lives of the building’s systems and major components. Additionally, coops are seldom required (if ever) by their governing documents to accumulate funds in advance of the need of such repairs.
Depending on the size of the building, emergency and unplanned repairs can result in a serious increase in maintenance or special assessments. High maintenance and assessments drive down apartment selling prices.
The board did all of this work without raising maintenance or passing a special assessment.
With an Engineering Systems Report, a 5 year Capital Budget Plan and a culture of working together for the benefit of all residents, 360 East 72nd Street was a rare example of a Coop, thanks to its Board, that took a building with serious problems and rebuilt most of the infrastructure….The board did all of this work without raising maintenance or passing a special assessment.
The Costs:
Brick replacements/balconies $8.5 million
A/C chiller $995,000
Oil tank $213,000
35th floor roof $510,000
Elevators (machinery) $510,000
Elevators (cabs) $170,000
18th Floor roof $249,000
Total $11,600,500
Tis the Season: Coop Financials Released in May – Part 3 of 3
Posted by: | CommentsThis is the third in a 3 part series. In Part 1, we discussed the General Principles of a Coop Corproation and the Telltale signs of a GOOD Building. Part 2 discussed what to look for in Coop Financials. Finally, we’ll look at:
Assessing a Coop’s Financial Condition
It has been my experience that very few buildings are in such a state of financial disrepair as to warrant a decision on the part of the buyer not to purchase in a particular building.
This was not always the case especially in the 1980’s and early 1990’s, a time that saw a tremendous amount of new conversions and with that, the problems that arise in such situations. Currently, the overwhelming majority of coops have been established for over fifteen years (a very conservative estimate) and has in many ways gotten the kinks out of their financials. They tend to enjoy low or no sponsor ownership, attractive financing and low instances of shareholder default.
In spite of the likelihood that the majority of buildings are solvent, buyers are concerned about the potential for increased maintenance and assessments, these concerns are the main motivation behind their question; “Is this a good building?”
Before forming an opinion, it is essential to understand the following points:
- Buildings, regardless of their location, age and prominence, need on-going repair and the replacement of parts, systems, and structure.
- Operational costs are subject to inflationary pressure and therefore are likely to rise.
- Salaries are subject to union mandates.
- Taxes are subject to the municipality.
- The only manner in which a building can raise money is by employing one or more of the following sources:
- Refinance their underlying mortgage.
- Exercise their ability to draw upon a line of credit.
- Raise maintenance.
- Institute an assessment.
- Institute a flip tax on resales.
Based on the aforementioned, it is logical to conclude that ownership costs are going to rise in 99% of the cases.
The job at hand is to assess that a building is being run conscientiously (an imperative) and predict to what extent future costs are likely to rise.
Finally, I recommend a NY Times article which describes some Red Flags in a co op’s statement.
‘Tis the Season: Coop Financial Statements Released in May Part 2 of 3
Posted by: | Comments
In Part 1, we discussed the General Principles of a Coop Corproation and the Telltale signs of a GOOD Building. This post will discuss what to look for in Coop Financials.
Basic Items to Focus on in a Cooperative Financial Statement
- Liquid Assets.
- Underlying Mortgage(s).
- Total Income
- Maintenance Income
- Miscellaneous (Other) Income
- Total Expenses.
- Income from Operation before Depreciation.
- Income from Operation after Depreciation.
- Notes to the Financial Statement.
Liquid Assets
- Cash and cash equivalents. These constitute money that can be spent irrespective of prepaid items and mandated escrow funds. Cash typically exists in a in an operating account, savings account or is designated as a reserve fund.
- A building’s cash accounts should equal at least 2-3 months’ maintenance charges.
Underlying Mortgage(s)
- The overwhelming majority of coop corporations have an underlying mortgage as well as a subordinate mortgage. The latter generally appears in the form of a credit line that can be drawn upon as need presents itself.
- Underlying mortgages are generally 7-15 years in length with the final payment in the form of a balloon payment. These mortgages are considered commercial mortgages and are subject to higher interest rates than found in a conventional mortgage and are subject to pre-payment penalties. Additionally, mortgages of this type are commonly interest-only mortgages and seldom self-amortizing mortgages.
- When the purchaser of a coop applies for a mortgage, the lender needs to ascertain to what extent the purchase price of the unit relates to its pro rata share of the underlying mortgage. Most often the pro-rata share of the underlying mortgage is usually less than 20% of the purchase price, and in such case, there is no resistance from a lender to lend.
To determine the pro rata share of the underlying mortgage: divide the amount of the underlying mortgage by the total number of shares issued which equals the amount of mortgage per share and multiply that number by the number of shares allocated to the unit in question.
For example:
$8,000,000 (underlying mortgage) / 22,000 (total shares) = $363.63 per share x
147 (unit’s shares) = $53,454 (pro rata share of the underlying mortgage)
$53,454 / $650,000 (purchase price) = 8.22%
Total Income
- Maintenance income is sometimes referred to as rental income. It represents the sum of money paid to the corporation by the shareholders. Maintenance can be stable, it can increase from year to year, and in some instances, it can go down.
- A maintenance increase of up to 5% over the previous year would be considered normal whereas an increase in the vicinity of 10% would be considered high; however, every maintenance increase must be looked at within the context of the overall financial condition of the building.
- Miscellaneous income is income received from non-maintenance sources such as assessments, tax refunds, interest, dividends, flip taxes, proceeds of un-sold shares, commercial income, and laundry income. In most instances, income from non-maintenance sources should not exceed 20% of a building’s total income otherwise it will be a breach of the 80/20 rule and create a tax consequence for the building. In some instances where a building is receiving too much miscellaneous income, it has become necessary for the building to increase their maintenance to comply with this rule.
- In the past year or two, the 80/20 rule has been made more flexible to allow exceptions to the rule if certain conditions exist. One such condition would be when no more than 20% of the building is allocated to non-residential occupancy, the building may receive more than 20% of its income from miscellaneous sources.
Total Expenses
- This is the sum of money the coop spent for such items as debt service, utilities, repairs, insurance, service contracts, real estate taxes, management fees, legal fees, and salaries etc.
Income from Operations before Depreciation
- This is the difference between total income and total expenditures. Ideally,the total income should be equal to or slightly more than the expenditures. Realistically, the income flow might be slightly more or less than the expenditures.
- The significance of a negative cash flow before depreciation must be assessed in relationship to the existing maintenance level, the level of cash assets and the anticipated need for additional income. A negative cash flow of 5% or more would cause concern if it were the result of normal expenditures and not an extraordinary event. At times a coop may purposely budget a negative cash flow in order to absorb substantial cash reserves, and in doing so, would eliminate the need for a maintenance increase which might have a negative impact on values.
Income from Operations after Depreciation
- Income after depreciation is a “phantom number” and has no significance as long as it remains a negative. Should it be a positive number, the coop will be liable for federal income taxes.
Notes to the Financial Statement
- Pay notice to any items that might impact the coop’s need for additional cash flow or asset accumulation such as:
-
Terms of the underlying mortgage(s).
-
Land lease escalations.
-
Rental income variances.
-
Tax liabilities.
-
Late shareholder payments.
-
Assessments.
-
Capital improvements.
-
Impending lawsuits.
-
Miscellaneous Items
Sponsor Ownership
- Ideally, a low percentage of sponsor ownership is preferable to a high percentage of sponsor ownership. The latter places the possibility of a material default in the hands of a single shareholder and restricts or even inhibits a bank’s willingness to lend in the building.
- In cases where a sponsor or investor entity owns 10% or more of the shares, New York City mandates that such entity provide an annual affidavit that illustrates the differential between the rental income received (if any) and the maintenance due on the units in question.
- Other issues aside, the essential concern of shareholders is “Does the sponsor pay his maintenance in a timely manner?” The answer to this question is yes in 99% of the situations.
Future Repairs
- Coops seldom conduct a study to determine the remaining useful lives of the building’s systems and major components. Additionally, coops are seldom required (if ever) by their governing documents to accumulate funds in advance of the need of such repairs.
Ground Rent
- Ideally, it is better for a coop to own its land rather than to have to lease it. Leasing land is never a positive situation but not necessarily the reason to forgo purchasing in such a building. When evaluating a land lease building; notice the remaining term of the land lease, rent escalations, and renewal options. Pay particular note to when the property is going to be re-appraised for purposes of determining future ground rent.
- Land lease buildings do not necessarily have high maintenance charges, although they usually do.
- Land rent does not contribute to the tax deductibility of the maintenance.
- A “too short” land lease term (15 years or less) with no renewal option would severely impact the values of units in the building. In such an instance, a unit’s value could be defined as the difference between the fair market rental value, less the maintenance charge, multiplied by the number of years remaining on the land lease.
- It is always advisable for a purchaser to have an attorney review the land lease prior to signing the contract of sale.
Obtaining Updated Information from the Managing Agent
- Most financial statements reflect the state of affairs on December 31st of the preceding year. Such statements are usually issued between March and May of the following year.
- It is advisable to obtain updated information with regards to maintenance increases, assessments, and capital improvements when the purchase is to be made between June and December, otherwise, the buyer would be relying on information that is 6-12 months old.
High Maintenance / Low Maintenance
- Too often, buyers and brokers are apt to state an industry standard for the cost of maintenance in terms of $X.00 per square foot. This way of thinking is erroneous because there are many variable items that comprise maintenance and the amount of people that share in these expenses varies from building to building. For example: a building with 250 shareholders has the same expense for a 24-hour doorman as a building with 25 shareholders.
- Other variables include:
- Terms of the underlying mortgage: amount, interest rate, interest only payments vs. amortized payments, amortization term.
- Improved building systems versus the status quo.
- High service versus low service: concierge, elevator operator, lobby attendants, handymen, porters, resident manager.
- On-site amenities versus no amenities.
Reserve Fund
The lack of a reserve fund, or cash cushion, is not necessarily a negative condition. Having money in reserve is relative to the need of having money in reserve. If there is high need, then a reserve fund is important. If there is low need, then a reserve fund is not as important.
Additionally, money can only be accrued if the coop takes measures to create such a fund from the following sources:
- Positive cash flow (income over expenses prior to depreciation).
- Assessments
- Cash-out refinance of their underlying mortgage,
- Secondary financing or credit line.
- Flip taxes.
- Sale of un-sold shares (if any).
Assessments
- Assessments are a viable means to create needed cash to pay for improvements or supplement cash flow in lieu of increasing maintenance or borrowing money. Assessments tend to be considered single events (sometimes ongoing) in which case they are less likely to inhibit values as does “too high” maintenance frequently does.
- Unlike a maintenance increase, an assessment accrues towards the building’s cost basis and in doing so adds favorably to the building’s ability to depreciate against income.
- Many coops choose not to accrue such funds until the actual need for such funds arises. Coop documents typically do not impose mandates on the accrual of such funds.
In Part 3 we’ll discuss Assessing a Coop’s Financial Condition.





