Archive for Condo

 Are you enticed by the mortgage interest lowest rates in decades? If so you’re not alone, but they are often out of borrowers’ reach. Lenders base their rates on perceived risk. Only if you can show you’re low-risk would you qualify for a rate that matches those seen in headlines.

If you’re looking for the lowest available rates consider these basic factors:

  • Credit Score: The ideal FICO score is around 740 or higher. This will put you in the best place for pricing.
  • Points: 1% of the loan amount is a point, and by paying points you can reduce your mortgage rate. Be sure to ask for a zero point quote as well to compare the two rates.
  • Property Types: Such property types as duplexes, condominiums in newer buildings or with lower down payments, commercial properties or non-owner occupied properties come with higher rates.
  • Down Payment: Experts say putting down at least 25% could lead to more attractive pricing. Lenders offer different breaks on rates if equity is higher.
  • Loan Length: ARM and 15-year loans are often lower than those on the 30-year loan. Consider how long you plan to live in the property and weigh your options.
  • Other considerations:
    • Lock-in: You may receive a lower rate for a shorter lock period 30-45 days rather than the usual 60 days
    • Additional ownership costs, taxes, insurance and maintenance.

 Inspired by New York Times Article by Vickie Elmer published January 12, 201

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For most buyers in Manhattan, getting past the asking price of a co-op or condo is only the first in a series of seemingly insurmountable obstacles.  The monthly maintenance fee is the second.  From a few hundred dollars a month to a few thousand depending on the various buildings, most owners find the maintenance fee never goes down, and rarely stays constant.   Most are adjusted on an annual basis.

Buyers need to be concerned about the fee as a direct impact on the property value, not just because of the cash going out every month.  The maintenance fee covers operating costs:  Staff Salaries, management fees, heat, water and sewer and other items.  In co-ops, the real estate tax bill and underlying mortgages on the entire building is part of the maintenance fee, and is proportional to the number of shares you own in the co-op corporation.

Condos are different. The common charges still cover the operating costs the same as co-ops, but the property tax bill goes directly to the owner because of the different ownership type.  Condos may have more amenities but lower common charges due to this distinction.

According to the Council of New York Tax Cooperatives and Condominiums, the fees have skyrocketed over the last decade.  For example, the median maintenance fee for co-ops on the West Side of Manhattan rose by 59% between 2000 and 2009, while condo common charges increased by 38% city-wide for the same period.

Increasing Real Estate Taxes are the main reason for the rise in co-op fees.  Both the tax rate and the assessment of property values have increased in recent years.  On the West Side, co-op median real estate taxes increased by 116% between 2000 and 2009.   On the East Side in 2000, 23% of the maintenance paid was attributed to taxes; by 2009, that figure had risen to 33.3%, indicating that taxes were a larger portion of the maintenance fees.

Land Leases are another issue for increased maintenance fees for some co-ops.  As a number of co-ops do not own the land their building sits upon, rather rents the land.  Some of those leases are coming up for renewal soon, and the experts predict there will be a huge jump in cost.

Finding savings to offset the increases is difficult.  Most costs are fixed, including salaries, taxes, insurance, upkeep and utilities.  Several co-ops have hired consultants to check for water leaks, while others are switching to natural gas from oil heat.  Still others are metering each apartment’s utilities separately.

Many co-ops are refinancing their underlying mortgages to take advantage of low interest rates.  Others are generating income by imposing or increasing fees for using the bike room, moving in or out or renting a unit.

Reviewing a building’s financials will give a buyer an understanding of how a building spends its money.  If you disagree with how a building spends the fees, there’s little point in moving there.   See our Series on reviewing building financials starting with  ‘Tis the Season: Many Manhattan Coop Financial Statements Are Released In May.

Inspired by New York Times Article on Jan 15, 2012 by Jim Rendon.

This week, we released our Fourth Quarter report for the Manhattan Residenital Rental Market.  Manhattan Residential Rentals Market Overview Q4 2011 reported here and summarized below was prepared by Miller Samuel for Prudential Douglas Elliman.

“Tight mortgage credit conditions continued to drive rental prices and activity higher.”

  • The median net effective rent (face rent less landlord concessions) jumped 9.5% from $2,950 to $3,121 in the same period last year. The year-over-year-gains were consistent across all rental price indicators.
  • The 2-bedroom and 3-bedroom markets outpaced their smaller counterparts,increasing 14% and 18.1% respectively over the same period.
  • New rental activity (excluding lease renewals) was up 10% from 7,217 to 7,942 in the same quarter last year.
  • About 7.4% of new leases had some form of landlord concession compared to the 40.5% in the prior year quarter. For those leases with concessions, the average amount was the equivalent of 1.2 months of free rent.
  • Days on market—the number of days from original list date to lease signing—was at its second fastest pace of 37 days in 15 years, which is when we began tracking this metric.

Our Q4 Manhattan Market Overview was released today and summarized below was prepared by Miller Samuel for Prudential Douglas Elliman.

“After a year of mixed economic news, the Manhattan housing market, while continuing to experience overall price stability, closed out the year with a slower pace of sales.”

  •  Median sales price was $855,000, a modest 1.2% increase from $845,000 in the prior year quarter. Price per square foot increased 5.6% to $1,117 from $1,058 over the same period.
  • There were 2,011 sales in the fourth quarter, 12.4% less than 2,295 in the prior year quarter. The fourth quarter had the lowest number of sales since the same period six years ago, perhaps related to the unusual surge in sales in the prior quarter. Pending sales were also below the prior year level.
  • There were 7,221 active listings at the end of the fourth quarter, essentially unchanged from the same period last year, but 2.6% less than the ten-year quarterly average of 7,412.
  • Days on market—the number of days from the last price change if any to the contract date—saw a modest 5 day increase to 130 days from 125 days, still consistent with the 132 day average for the prior decade.
  • Listing discount—the percent difference between the list price at time of sale to the sales price—fell to 4.9% from 8% in the same period last year.

Making up 75% of all housing stock in New York, Co-ops are the most common type of housing excluding rentals.  The average co-op maintenance fee in New York City climbed 19% from 2009 to 2010 to $1.76 per square foot per month, according to Miller Samuel, a Manhattan-based appraisal company that tracks maintenance costs.

Maintenance fees  usually cover debt service for the underlying mortgage, property taxes, maintenance, personnel and other items.  These fees are usually apportioned per share of stock in the corporation, and are in addition to the owner’s individual mortage (if any).  A review of a co-op’s financial documents will give you the breakdown on the expenses.

What’s behind this increase?

  • Property Taxes:  New York City Property Tax revenue increased 9.68% in 2009 according to the NYC Department of Finance.
  • Utility costs:  Natural Gas and heating oil costs continue to increase. Water costs are up slightly.
  • Building Staff. Salary and benefits, usually renegotiated under union contracts every two to 3 years. 
  • Insurance Costs:  Varies by building and location, usually covering liability and disaster damages
  • Building upkeep, including major repairs to plumbing, electrical, heating and the roof.

What can the Board do?

  • Cancel or delay discretionary projects
  • Request several estimates for upcoming projects.
  • Refinance underlying mortgages.
  • Impliment a flip tax.

When faced with rising costs, there is little a co-op board can do but pass the costs throught to the shareholders as either increased maintenance fees or temporary (or permenant) assessments.  The decision to raise maintenance fees ultimately rests with the co-op boards.

Inspired by Smart Money article by Annamaria Androitis.

As we reported in May,  the Federal Government backed new mortgage lending limits program expired in September, 2011.  This week, the U.S. House and Senate voted to restore the FHA loan limits to the previous maximum $729,750.  According to the National Association of Realtors, this will help provide stability to communities as credit restrictions continue to prevent some qualified buyers from becoming home owners.

The restoration of the limits only apples to FHA mortgages, not Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which also expired at the end of September.  The conforming loan limit for these two secondary mortgage market companies will remain at a maximum of $625,500.

While this may be good news for many markets, in Manhattan, where over 70% of the apartments for sale are Co-ops, it probably won’t make much difference.  Most co-op boards require 20-50% down payments and higher income to debt rations (25-30% maximum debt to income).   Lenders for most condos are asking for at least 20% down payment to qualify for a loan.

Excerpts from Daily Real Estate News, November 18, 2011

Today we released third quarter sales  for the Brooklyn residential market.  Brooklyn Market Overview Q3 2011 reported here and summarized below was prepared by Miller Samuel for Prudential Douglas Elliman.

“Sales noticeably increased, as all price indicators edged higher, and listing inventory remained stable.”

  • There were 2,219 sales in the third quarter, 18.1% more than 1,879 sales in the prior year quarter, and the second highest quarterly total in three years.
  • Median sales price increased 5% to $510,000 from the prior year quarter, reaching its highest level in three years, and tying the 2008 third quarter level.
  • Listing inventory edged 0.9% higher to 6,688 in the third quarter from the prior year quarter. With the rise in sales outpacing the increase in inventory, the absorption rate fell to 9 months from 10.6 months over the same period.
  • Days on market expanded by nearly a month over the same period to 149 days from 109 days in the prior year quarter, as stable inventory, and higher sales resulted in an increase in sales from older listings.
  • The listing discount—the difference between the listing price at time of contract and the contract price—was 3% in the third quarter, down from 5% over the same period last year.

 

Our Q3 Manhattan Market Overview which was released Tuesday and summarized below was prepared by Miller Samuel for Prudential Douglas Elliman.

  • Housing prices in Manhattan continue to remain stable. The median sales price of a Manhattan apartment was $911,333 in the third quarter, essentially unchanged from $914,000 in the prior year quarter and up 7.2% from $850,000 in the prior quarter.
  • Although year-over-year co-op sales activity was unchanged, the increase in condo activity resulted in a 16.7% year-over-year increase in overall sales activity. An increase in demand from foreign buyers due to the weak US dollar is likely a key factor for the gain.
  • There were 7,726 active listings at the end of the third quarter, 4.9% fewer than 8,123 listings in the same period last year and 4.3% less than 8,070 listings in the prior quarter.
  • Consistent with the decline in inventory, the time to sell an apartment and the discount from list price have also declined. Days on market fell to 119 days from 125 days and the discount from the list price at time of sale slipped to 4.4% from 5.8%, both from the same period last year.

  • “Despite a banner month for Governor Cuomo, New Yorkers put their Trumpets down when it came to the Economy” Read all about it at Siena Research Institute
  • New York City Tax Commissioner Announces 10% Assessment Cap on Co-ops, Condos. “New York City Finance Commissioner David M. Frankel confronted his critics yesterday at a City Council Hearing in May, announcing he was placing a 10% cap on tax assessment increases for co-op and condo properties in the five Boroughs.” Read about it at Habitat.
  • AGs, Banks near $60B deal on Foreclosures. “America’s biggest mortgage servicers are closing in on a deal with federal and state officials to settle some of the thorniest foreclosure problems.” Read about it in the New York Post.
  • Manhattan rents rise with room to go higher. “The Manhattan apartment rental market has been heating up for months, and second-quarter market reports released today by residential brokerages Citi Habitats and Prudential Douglas Elliman show skyrocketing rents. Now, the question is how long the rent increases will continue.”  Read about it at the Real Deal
  • Homes Dark and Lifeless, Kept by Out-of-Towners “some Manhattan neighborhoods are assuming that vacant feeling the year round, because the people who own or rent apartments there actually live somewhere else most of the time” Read about it in the New York Times

  • Foreclosures fall 38% in May for New York City according to data from PropertyShark.com, the total number of residential foreclosures fell last month from May 2010, however co-op apartments made up 79% of all new foreclosure auctions scheduled. Read it all in Crain’s New York
  • Federal Reserve publishes Beige Book June 8, 2011 “The Second District’s economy has continued to expand since the last report, though at a somewhat diminished pace.”
  • City’s Design Sector grew 75% the past decade:  “More designers are employed here than in any other U.S. city, thanks in part to an explosion in recent years of Brooklyn-based companies, said the report, released on Wednesday by The Center for an Urban Future, a think tank in Manhattan. It noted that the number of Brooklyn-based firms spiked from 257 in 2001 to 433 in 2009, for a 70% increase”.  Read it all in Crain’s New York.
  • The Bullish Case for the U.S. Economy  “Investment strategist Robert Doll says America’s edge is faster population growth, companies that are global in scope, and a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship.”  Read it all in the Wall Street Journal.

Truth, lies and statistics!

Earlier this month,  Zillow released its Q1 Real Estate Report.  Many in the press joined in and cried gloom and doom.

The hysteria was best summarized by a Curbed article that listed the 10 Most Depressing Things Mentioned in The Zillow Report.  Perhaps real estate prices continue to decrease in Phoenix, Los Vegas, Tampa, etc., but in New York City, especially Manhatan,  it’s just not the case.

You would be misled if you simply looked at the Zillow Home Value Index for New York Metro data and assumed it had anything to do with Manhattan Residential real estate sales.

  MoM QoQ YoY
New York Metro -.5% -1.6% -5.3%

But if you focus on coops and condo sales which account for over 99% of residential properties sold in Manhattan vs single family homes , you’ll see that in New York City there have been significant price increases

  MoM QoQ YoY
New York Coop+Condo +2.3% +7.5% +19.2%

As previously discussed with regard to the Case Shiller report discussed here, the Case Shiller report excludes new developments, condos and coops.  At least the Zillow report has that data available (perhaps not new development) but you have to dig for it.

All real estate is local.  So local, in fact that certain neighborhoods, blocks, buildings and even specific apartments have their own hyper-local real estate data.

Coops Condos in Manhattan NYCCaught in the maze of buying an apartment in New York City? The rules are different in New York City than in other parts of the country! For the inexperienced some of the differences may be perplexing, however, we can guarantee that if you do your homework and keep this guide handy, the process will flow much more smoothly.

New York is a city comprised mainly of cooperative and condominium apartments with a smaller selection of private homes, which we call townhouses or brownstones. Most important is understanding the differences between the types of apartments you will find in Manhattan.

Co-operative Buildings

Cooperatives are not a new concept, although they seem to be a type of ownership that is more common in New York City than elsewhere in the United States. In New York City, approximately 80% of our apartments available for purchase are in cooperative buildings, while 20% are in condominiums. This means two very simple things to potential buyers in New York City:

  1. There is more inventory to choose from if the buyer includes co-ops into the mix of properties, and
  2. Prices are, in general, more attractive for cooperatives – simple supply and demand.

Cooperatives are owned by an apartment corporation. Individual tenants do not actually “own” their apartments as they would in the case of “real” property. Owners, (shareholders) of co-op apartments, actually own “shares” in the corporation which entitles them to a long-term “proprietary lease.” The corporation pays the total amount of the building’s mortgage (importantly, a cooperative may have an underlying mortgage on the entire building, whereas a condominium building must be owned outright), real estate taxes, employee salaries, and other expenses for the upkeep of the building. The tenant-owner, in turn, pays a portion of these expenses as determined by the number of shares the tenant owns in the corporation. Share amounts are dictated by apartment size and floor level.

The considerations when buying a cooperative are:

  1. The Board of Directors has the right to “approve” or “reject” any potential owner. The board, elected by all of the tenant-owners of the co-op, interviews all prospective owners. It has the responsibility of protecting the interests of all tenant-owners by selecting well-qualified candidates.
  2. The quality of services and the security of the building are kept at high standards.
  3. Portions of the monthly maintenance are tax deductible. Each building has its own tax structure, but all co-ops offer a tax advantage. Shareholders can deduct their portion of the building’s real estate taxes, as well as their proportionate share of the interest on the building’s mortgage.
  4. The amount of money that may be financed is determined by each cooperative. Some buildings require substantial down payments. Generally speaking, in Manhattan prospective purchasers should be prepared to “put down” at least 20 to50% of the purchase price (depending on the building) when purchasing a cooperative apartment.
  5. Subleasing a co-op must be approved by the Board of Directors of the cooperative. Each corporation has its own rules, and they should be examined if a potential owner intends to sublet.

With this in mind, it is important to remember that co-ops are the norm here in Manhattan, not the exception. However, before beginning a search for a cooperative apartment, think about the financing limitations and the application and interview process.

Condominium Buildings

While condominiums are quite common throughout the country, they are a rather new concept for New York City. A condominium apartment in Manhattan is real property. The buyer gets a deed just as if he were buying a house. Since this is real property, there is a separate tax lot for each apartment. Hence, this means the buyer pays his own real estate taxes for the property. An owner will also pay common charges on a monthly basis. Common charges are similar to maintenance in a cooperative. However, they will not include real estate taxes since these are paid separately, nor will they include the building’s mortgage and interest given that a condominium, by law, cannot have an underlying mortgage. Condominiums are attractive for a variety of reasons:

  1. Financing the purchase of a condominium apartment is governed by the financial markets not a board of directors and thereby much more flexible than in a cooperative. In the past, a buyer could finance up to 90% or more of the purchase price. However, with the current  conservative credit practices, you should be prepared to “put down” about 20% or more even for a condo.
  2. An approval process is usually required, and most condo boards are requiring application packages with financial disclosure. Generally, however, the requirements are not as rigorous as the co-op boards. A board meeting may or may not be required. The length of time for approval varies from building to building, but it is usually not as long as a co-op approval process.
  3. There is greater flexibility in sub-leasing your apartment. This makes condominiums the better choice for investment property.
  4. They are the ideal choice for non-U.S. citizens or for those with their assets held outside of the United States given that co-ops are unlikely to approve a buyer whose funds are not in the U.S.

Given that there are fewer condominiums than cooperatives and that they are “easier” to purchase, they are generally more expensive than co-ops. Additionally, monthly combined common charges and real estate taxes in a condo are typically less than a co-op’s monthly maintenance charges, again resulting in higher purchase prices.

Excerpted and modified from Prudential Douglas Elliman.

Mortgage Rates Coop

Condominium buyers in the New York area often paid little mind to Federal Housing Administration mortgages, either because these government-backed loans had relatively low dollar limits or because federal rules put them beyond the reach of most condo associations.

But last year, the federal government raised the maximum F.H.A. loan amount to $729,750 from $362,790 for high-cost areas like Manhattan and northern New Jersey. It recently extended that ceiling through 2010. F.H.A.’s new rules will open an important lending option to condo buyers, especially those with weak credit.

  • Although interest rates may be higher, borrowers with credit scores as low as 600 can often qualify.
  • They can secure a mortgage with a down payment of less than 5 percent. The downside, though, is that borrowers must pay an F.H.A. insurance premium, similar to private mortgage insurance. On a $729,750 mortgage, the maximum conforming mortgage in New York City, with a high LTV (say if you put down 5% on a $768K condo), that could add over $450 to the monthly payment.
  • Most condos include in their ownership agreements the “right of first refusal.” Such language grants the condo association the right to buy a unit at the price listed by the unit’s owner. In the pastt FHA had barred such clauses but now that restriction has now been dropped.
  • The government has also streamlined the process for lenders that want to qualify a condominium for the F.H.A. program. Lenders can now approve condos without applying to the government, if they believe the condominium complies with F.H.A. lending policies. The F.H.A. will permit these “spot approvals” until Jan. 31, 2010, but lenders say they are hopeful the government will extend the policy beyond that date.
  • The government also relaxed rules that had limited the number of condominiums that would qualify for F.H.A. loans. Under the old rules, if more than 50 percent of a new development was unsold, the F.H.A. would deny a loan. Now, just 30 percent of a development must be sold before an F.H.A. borrower can qualify.
  • In addition, the old rules capped, at 30 percent, the share of condos that could have F.H.A. loans in a given development. Now the figure is 50 percent.

Graph and above points excerpted from November 20, 2009 NY Times article by Bob Tedeschi

According to a new J.D. Power and Associates study the average time required to approve and close a home loan has increased to nearly 47 days, compared with approximately 30 days in 2008. The reason? Increased scrutiny of loan applications and higher origination volumes driven by increases in refinancing. Not surprisingly, the longer wait times are fueling a decline in overall customer satisfaction with primary mortgage lenders.
The study also finds that credit scores are now higher among mortgage customers and the percentage of loan applicants who have been faced with requests for additional documentation has increased considerably—to 45 percent in 2009 from 33 percent in 2008.

“While the more cautious approach to underwriting mortgages is justified, the longer turn times and more numerous requests for information tend to have a negative impact on satisfaction,” said David Lo, director of financial services at J.D. Power and Associates. “Good underwriting and delivering a satisfying customer experience are not mutually exclusive, and some of the negative effects of a tightened lending environment can be mitigated by simply improving communication between lenders and customers.”

The 2009 Primary Mortgage Origination Satisfaction Study measures customer satisfaction in four key factors of the mortgage origination experience:

  • application/approval process
  • loan officer/mortgage broker
  • closing
  • contact

According to responses from more than 3,400 consumers who originated new mortgages within the previous 12 months here’s the top mortgage lenders BB&T (Branch Banking and Trust) 783 out of 1,000,  Wachovia 781, National City Mortgage  769, SunTrust Mortgage 769, Wells Fargo 754, Flagstar Bank 744, GMAC Mortgage  744,  Bank of America, 741

Plan

Plan

Just released today are the new 3Q 2009 Residential Sales Market Reports for Long Island and Hamptons/North Fork prepared by Miller Samual Inc. for Prudential Douglas Elliman.

Hamptons and North Fork Residential Sales ReportHamptons & North Fork

Median sales price was $700,000 in the third quarter, down 4% from $729,000 in the same period last year, but up 2.9% from $680,000 in the prior quarter.

In a release of pent-up demand, there were 459 sales in the third quarter, 49.5% more than the second quarter and 29.3% more than the same period last year.

Despite the surge in sales this summer, third quarter listing inventory expanded 5.8% to 2,419 properties compared to the prior quarter as sellers attempted to take advantage of the newly active housing market.

Days on market for properties that sold during the third quarter expanded to 198 days from 173 days at this time last year. The surge in demand enticed sellers to leave their property on the market, which drove this indicator higher.

The listing discount, the distance buyers and sellers had to travel to agree on price, expanded to 16.9% in the third quarter from 10.2% in the same period last year.

Long Island Residential Market Report 3Q 2009Long Island

The number of sales in the third quarter jumped 41.6% to 5,603 properties above prior quarter levels and was 5.9% above the number of sales seen during the same period last year.

The increase in the number of sales has reduced the number of properties available for sale. There were 22,170 properties listed for sale at the end of the third quarter, a 10.1% decline from the 24,672 listing inventory total of the same period last year.

Median sales price was $375,000 in the third quarter, up 4.2% from $360,000 in the prior quarter, but remained 9.6% below the $415,000 of the same period a year ago.

Days on market, or the time it took to market a property, was 116 days, essentially unchanged from 115 days in the same period last year, but was 10 days faster than the prior quarter.

The listing discount, which is the difference between the list price at time of sale and the contract price, was 6.5%, up nominally from 6.4% in the same period a year ago.